🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.